检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:庄天逸[1]
出 处:《河北法学》2008年第8期75-80,共6页Hebei Law Science
摘 要:行政强制执行,作为行政强制的一方面,关系到行政相对人的人身、财产等重要权利。在强调法治和人权的今天,这些属于公民的重要权利越来越受到统治者的重视。同时,行政权存在被滥用的危险,行政强制执行中也可能出现不法或不当情形。因此,法律应当对行政强制执行进行有效控制,从而维护公民合法权益。为实现此目的,法律应运用多种调整方法,法律救济就是其中的重要部分。在很多行政法治国家,行政强制执行的法律救济制度都比较完善,并各具特色。对于国外的一些成功经验,我国应当在立法过程中予以关注和参考。鉴于我国目前的法律救济制度存在某些方面的问题和不足,提出相关的立法构想。Administrative compulsory execution, as a part of administrative coercion, is related to the significant rights of administrative opposite person's body, property etc. Today, with emphasizing legality and human rights increasingly, these significant rights which belong to citizens are taken seriously by rulers more and more. At the same time, administrative power has the danger that administrators abuse it, and there are probably illegal or inappropriate conditions in the administrative compulsory execution, too. Therefore, law should control the administrative compulsory execution effectively, for protecting the legal rights of citizens. For achieving this aim, law needs to use several regulatory methods, and legal remedy is the important part in them. In many nations where administration is strictly ruled by law, the legal remedy systems of the administrative compulsory execution, which have different characteristics, are all quite perfect. Our nation should concern and learn some foreign successful experiences in the legislative process. For some problems and shortcomings in the present legal remedy system of our nation, this author raises the relevant legislative conceptions.
分 类 号:DF31[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.98