反兴奋剂的法理研究  

Legal study of anti-doping

作　　者：谢雪峰[1] 张厚福[1] 王晶[2] 刘丹里[1] 熊银[1] 

机构地区：[1]武汉体育学院高等教育研究所,湖北武汉430079 [2]湖北轻工职业技术学院体育部,湖北武汉430070

出　　处：《武汉体育学院学报》2008年第7期5-14,共10页Journal of Wuhan Sports University

基　　金：国家体育总局体育社会科学研究项目(898SS06030)

摘　　要：反兴奋剂司法中,"程序正义与实质正义"的取舍中,优先维护程序正义;"公平与效率"出现矛盾时,效率先于公平;"严格责任与过错责任"则分别适于"定罪"和"量型";面对"行为能力是否具备",目前是"对象一律"的策略,以后应立法加以改进。反兴奋剂执法中法律救济贯彻正义、公平理念,彰显人文关怀。反兴奋剂教育工作是反兴奋剂法理实践的自觉前移,彰显教育先于惩治、预防重于惩治的人文精神。我国应完善正式教育体系,将教育对象从运动员、管理人员扩大到各类社会人员,尤其是体育专业学生及其生源。反兴奋剂斗争是"体育精神与负面人性的博弈",而科技的发展给新类型和新品种兴奋剂出现带来可能,因而反兴奋剂具有复杂性、长期性。In anti-doping jurisdiction,the selection of procedural justice and substantial justice, should give priority to procedural justice. When there are contradictions in justice and efficiency, efficiency is more important than justice. Strict responsibility and fault responsibility are adopted separately to conviction and punishment. The law is the same to all the objects in whether they are legal capable or not, which needs to be improved. Legal assistance plays a special role in anti-doping jurisdiction. It can advocate justice and humanistic concern. Anti-doping education can display the spirit that education comes before punishment and prevention comes before punishment. In China, not only the athlete, but all the people in the society should be educated as to knowledge of anti-doping. Anti-doping has to undergo a long way because it is a game between sports spirit and negative human nature.

关 键 词：体育法学 兴奋剂 反兴奋剂立法 体育竞赛公平 “穷举法” 法理 

分 类 号：G80-05[文化科学—运动人体科学]