实行行为的着手及其认定——兼论西原春夫的犯罪着手学说  

Commencement and Cognizance of Crime Enforcement——concurrently Discussing on the Theory of Commencement of Crime Enforcement of Japanese Scholar

作　　者：冯殿美[1] 

机构地区：[1]山东大学法学院,山东济南250100

出　　处：《法学论坛》2008年第4期60-66,共7页Legal Forum

摘　　要：犯罪实行行为的着手是颇具争议的刑法理论问题,司法实践中对复杂案件的"着手"认定倍感棘手。实行行为的着手涉及到预备犯与未遂犯、预备阶段的中止与实行阶段的中止的界分问题,也是衡量正当防卫行为是否适时的判断依据。只有对现有观点系统地进行梳理,准确地界定实行行为着手的内涵、特征,科学地概括出一般犯罪实行行为着手的标准,才能在此基础上,进一步探讨间接正犯、原因自由行为、不作为形式等特殊形式犯罪的着手。Commencement of crime enforcement is a controversial issue of theoretical criminal law, while in judicial practice it is even more difficult for cognizance in complex cases. It connects with division between prepared crime and attempted guilty, suspension in preparatory phase and suspension in the implementation phase, and it is also the basis for judging whether self- defense is timely. Only after we review the present system of viewpoints, precisely define commencement of crime enforcement and its characteristics, appropriately summarize general standards of criminal enforcement commencement, can we further explore enforcement of indirect principal offence, reasons for liberty, nonfeasance and other special forms of crime commencement.

关 键 词：实行行为 着手 认定 

分 类 号：D917[政治法律—法学]