两种方法治疗输卵管阻塞性不孕结果比较  

The treatment patients with infertility reformed-fallopian tube obstruction by two methods

作　　者：陈文滨[1] 谭彩群[2] 

机构地区：[1]惠州中心医院药剂科,广东省惠州516001 [2]惠州中心医院中医科,广东省惠州516001

出　　处：《中国基层医药》2008年第6期915-916,共2页Chinese Journal of Primary Medicine and Pharmacy

摘　　要：目的探讨改良法输卵管再通术配台中药治疗输卵管阻塞性不孕的临床疗效。方法将80例输卵管阻塞性不孕患者随机分为两组，再通术配合中药治疗组（治疗组）40例，单纯再通术治疗组（对照组）40例，术后随访6个月至1年，统计两种治疗方法的有效率、宫内妊娠率、异位妊娠率。结果治疗组有效率为72．5％，对照组有效率为57．5％，两组比较差异有统计学意义（P〈0．05）。随访6个月至1年，治疗组官内妊娠率为52．5％，异位妊娠率为5％；对照组宫内妊娠率为30．0％，异位妊娠率为7．5％。结论再通术配合中药治疗输卵管阻塞性不孕的有效率、受孕率优于单纯再通术。Objective To study the clinical the rapeutic efficacy of reformed-fallopian tube recanalization （RFTR） with Chinese traditional medicines for treatment of infertility resulted from fallopian tube obstruction. Methods 80 patients of infertile women with fallopian tube obstruction were randomly divided in to the treated group（ n = 40, treated with RFTR combined with Chinese traditional medicines） and the control group （ n = 40, treated with RFTR alone）. All cases were followed up for 6 to 12 months. The efficacy rate,pregnancy rate,ectopic pregnancy rate and the re-adhension rate were recorded in both groups. Results The efficacy rate of treated group and the control group were 72.5 % and 57.5 % respectively, with statistical significance（ P 〈 0.05 ）. The pregnaney rates of the two groups were 52.5 % and 30.0 % respectively. The ectopic pregnancy rate of the two groups were 5 % and 7.5 % respectively. Conclusion RFTR with Chinese traditional medicines therapy is an effective method to treat in fertility resulted from fallopian tube obstruction.

关 键 词：输卵管疾病 不育 女(雌)性 输卵管造影术 中药 

分 类 号：R711[医药卫生—妇产科学]