检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]杭州师范大学体育与健康学院,浙江杭州310036
出 处:《杭州师范大学学报(自然科学版)》2008年第4期316-320,共5页Journal of Hangzhou Normal University(Natural Science Edition)
摘 要:运用文献调研法、问卷调查法和综合评价法以雅典奥运会成绩为例,对世界主要体育大国竞技体育的综合实力采用三种不同综合评价方法进行评价.结果显示对世界主要体育大国竞技体育总体实力的评价指标包括金牌数、奖牌数、前8名小项总数、田径与游泳的前8名数、三大球的前8名数、金牌和奖牌所在大项数;三种评价方法对中国竞技体育综合实力的评价结果是一致的,中国位居第三.文章从定量的角度对中国竞技体育的总体实力作出较科学的评价.With documental, questionnaire and evaluation methods, the author has three evaluation methods on sports strength of the major sports countries in the world, taking the performance of the Athens Olympic Games for example. The research shows that the influencing factors are total of the number of gold medals and medal, the number of former eighth, former eighth for 3-big-ball, track and field and swimming, as well as the number of gold medal and medal events. The appraisement results of 3 kinds of assessmenl methods for the comprehensive strength of Chinese sports strength are the same, which ranks 3rd, thus the paper makes scientific appraisement with quantitative research for Chinese sports strength.
分 类 号:G80-32[文化科学—运动人体科学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.24