检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]温州医学院护理学院,浙江温州325000 [2]温州医学院附属第一人民医院急诊ICU
出 处:《解放军护理杂志》2008年第14期37-38,共2页Nursing Journal of Chinese People's Liberation Army
基 金:校级课题(XNK07102)
摘 要:目的探讨肾病综合征(nephritic syndrome,NS)患儿父母焦虑、抑郁及应对方式的情况,以更好地提供身心护理及行为指导。方法采用焦虑自评量表(SAS)、抑郁自评量表(SDS)及简易应对方式量表(simplified copingstyle questionnaire,SCSQ)分别对54位NS患儿的父母进行测评。结果NS患儿父母SAS和SDS评分明显高于国内常模(P<0.01);患儿父母SAS和SDS评分与其文化程度、应对方式以及患儿是否复发明显相关(P<0.05);患儿父母较多采用积极应对方式,较少采用消极应对方式(P<0.01)。结论焦虑和抑郁情绪在NS患儿父母中普遍存在,应予以高度重视,尤其要更多关注文化程度较高、多次复发患儿的父母。Objective To investigate the anxiety,depression and coping style in parents of children with nephritic syndrome (NS), so as to provide better physical and mental nursing care and behavior guidance. Methods Fifty-four parents of children with NS were surveyed with the Self-rating Anxiety Scale (SAS), Self-rating Depression Scale (SDS) and Simplified Coping Style Questionnaire (SCSQ). Results The SAS and SDS scores in parents of children with NS were obviously higher than the China norm(P〈0.01). There was obvious correlation between the parents' SAS and SDS scores and their educational level, coping style and the children's relapse(P〈0.05). Most of the parents took active coping style rather than passive coping style( P〈0.05). Conclusion Anxiety and depression are common problems among parents of children with NS. Much attention should be paid to them,especially the parents of children with relapse occurrence and with higher education level.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.236