论话语义同语言义的联系和区别  

Utterance Meaning and Language Meaning: Their Relations and Disparities

作　　者：郑远汉[1] 

机构地区：[1]武汉大学文学院,湖北武汉430072

出　　处：《福建师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2008年第4期60-65,共6页Journal of Fujian Normal University:Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition

摘　　要：近些年,随着话语学的兴起,语义研究的范围扩大了,涉猎了话语义或语用义方面的一些问题。但是,话语义同语言义之间是怎样的关系呢?这方面的讨论好像还不多。修辞活动是从语言系统中选取词语、句子,因此必须首先就语言层面弄清有关词语的词义,有关句子的句义,修辞活动又是在话语中进行的,离开话语就无所谓修辞,而话语显现的是话语义。因此,修辞研究必须要思考话语义和语言义的关系问题。本文就语言义的一般性和话语义的具体性、语言义的稳固(固定)性和话语义的临时性这两个方面,从对比中说明话语义同语言义的联系和区别。In recent years, with the emergence of discourse studies, the semantic research has widened its scope to involve issues concerning utterance meaning or pragmatic meaning. However, how is utterance meaning related to language meaning？ In this connection there doesn＇ t seem to be much literature. Since rhetorical activities mean the choice of words and sentences in the linguistic system, it is necessary to first have a clear linguistic understanding of the meaning of words and sentences. On the other hand, rhetorical activities are conducted regarding utterances and rhetoric is inseparable from utterance with its utterance meaning. In terms of rhetoric, therefore, one has to face the problem of how utterance meaning and language meaning are related. The present paper aims to account for the relations and disparities of the two types of meanings by contrast from two perspectives： the general nature of language meaning and the concreteness of utterance meaning, the stability of language meaning and the temporariness of utterance meaning.

关 键 词：语言(单位)义 话语义 话语义的具体性 话语义的临时性 

分 类 号：H05[语言文字—语言学]