检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:彭森[1] 程伟光[1] 周德明[1] 张婷[1] 林建勤[1]
出 处:《现代医院》2008年第8期60-61,共2页Modern Hospitals
摘 要:目的本研究比较了试验性增强法与常规增强法在肝脏CT动态增强扫描中的应用情况,探讨了试验性增强法在肝脏CT动态增强中的应用价值。方法对425倒接受肝脏CT动态增强扫描检查的患者进行回顾性分析。其中第一组203人次按常规方法行CT动态增强(在静脉开始注射造影剂后14~18s进行动脉期扫描),第二组222人次接受试验性增强法CT动态增强检查。比较、分析两组增强结果。结果第一组57.1%(116/203)的病例获得了最佳的肝动脉期图像,第二组87.4%(194/222)的病例获得了最佳的肝动脉期图像。统计学分析两组肝动脉期图像质量优良率的差异具有统计学意义。结论试验性增强法肝脏CT动态增强扫描对于肝脏动脉期的显示优于常规CT动态增强检查法。Objective The purpose of this study was to identify the usefulness of the test - injection method as compared with the fixed - time method in dynamic CT of liver. Methods 425 patients have been studied that underwent dynamic CT. 203 patients (group 1 ) accepted the fixed -time method (14 -18 seeond scan time delay in the hepatic arterial phase [ HAP] ). 222 patients ( group 2) accepted the test - injection method. The adequacy of the HAP was evaluated. Result In group 1, 57.1% ( 116/ 203 )of the cases were obtained at the optimal HAP; the percentage in group 2 was 87.4% (194/222)of the eases. This difference was statistically significant (p 〈 0. 05 ). Conclusion The CT using the test - injection method resulted in better optimal HAP than the CT using the fixed - time method.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.145.85.3