检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]广东省中医院,广东广州510120
出 处:《中国中医药信息杂志》2008年第8期14-15,99,共3页Chinese Journal of Information on Traditional Chinese Medicine
摘 要:目的观察砭石治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重期的疗效。方法采用随机对照方法,将145例慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重期患者分为综合组、中药组和对照组,综合组49例采用砭石热熨背部、中药汤剂以及西医常规治疗,中药组48例采用中药汤剂配合西医常规治疗,对照组48例采用西医常规治疗。结果临床总有效率综合组89.80%,中药组85.42%,对照组72.92%;综合组及中药组血气分析指标、肺通气功能指标的改善与对照组比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论纳入砭石疗法的中西医结合治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重期临床疗效令人满意。Objective To observe the effects of stone needle on chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in acute exacerbation period (AECOPD). Methods One hundred and forty five cases of AECOPD were randomly divided into three groups. Patients in combined treatment group (n=49) received that stone needle hot compresses the back and Chinese herbal medicine besides routine treatment. Patients in Chinese herbal medicine group (n=48) received Chinese herbal medicine besides routine treatment. Patients in placebo group (n=48) received routine treatment. Results The effective rate of combined treatment group was 89.80%, and that of Chinese herbal medicine group was 85.42%, which were all significantly higher than which in placebo group (72.92%, P〈0.05). The improvement of blood gas analysis and pulmonary function in combined treatment group and Chinese herbal medicine group was significantly higher than which in placebo group. Conclusion The combined treatment which comprised stone needle has better effect on AECOPD.
分 类 号:R259.63[医药卫生—中西医结合]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.22.41.47