“大公无私”与“公私两无”--对中国传统“崇公抑私”政治思维方式的反思  

All Selflessness No Selfishness" and "Neither Selflessness nor Selfishness

作　　者：刘中建[1] 

机构地区：[1]山东财政学院法律系,济南250014

出　　处：《山东大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2008年第4期146-151,共6页Journal of Shandong University(Philosophy and Social Sciences)

基　　金：山东财政学院博士科研启动资金赞助

摘　　要：公、私问题是一个在中国历史过程具有全局性的问题。中国传统文化在"公"、"私"关系上的主导政治思维方式是"崇公抑私","崇公抑私"的目的是为了实现一种理想的政治境界:"大公无私"。但这种政治思维方式在现实中却造成伦理道德、社会政治生活、经济等多个领域"公私两无"的尴尬局面。中国传统文化中这种"崇公抑私"政治思维方式的固有缺陷表明:"公"与"私"是一种相互对立、相互依存的关系,对"公"的维护应当建立在对"私"的认可和尊重的基础之上,不然,"私"之不存,"公"亦难立,"公私两无"的局面就在所难免。The relationship between ＂other＂ and ＂self＂ is a general theme throughout of ancient Chinese history. The predominant teaching concerning selflessness and selfishness is to affirm and glorify selflessness but to deny selfishness, so as to achieve the political climate of ＂all selflessness and no selfishness＂. Unfortunately, the actual consequence of the practice of this teaching is the embarrassing state of ＂neither selflessness nor selfishness＂ in the fields of ethics, social politics as well as economics. The inherent defects of the traditional philosophy of ＂all self- lessness no selfishness＂ imply that ＂selflessness＂ and ＂selfishness＂ are interdependent and that selfishness must be given due recognition and respect to promulgate selflessness. Otherwise, self - denial in its strict sense could lead to the nonexistence of selflessness.

关 键 词：公 私 大公无私 崇公抑私 公私两无 

分 类 号：D09[政治法律—政治学]