检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《临床和实验医学杂志》2008年第8期61-62,共2页Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medicine
摘 要:目的研究评价造血干细胞移植预处理方案中静脉剂型马利兰的应用和疗效。方法22例患者预处理方案采用静脉剂型马利兰,30例患者采用口服剂型马利兰,观察两组的疗效及相关毒性。结果静脉剂型马利兰在胃肠道反应(22.7%)、口腔黏膜炎(18.2%)发生率低于口服剂型马利兰组(66.6%)及(83.8%)。无需补充给药,血药浓度稳定。结论预处理方案中应用静脉剂型马利兰,毒副作用少,疗效确切,比口服马利兰更有优势。Objective To explore the application and effect of intravenous busulfan in conditioning therapy in HSCT. Methods 22 patients were treated with intravenous busulfan and 30 patients with oral busulfan. Their effect and related toxicity were observed and compared with patients in these two groups. Results The incidence rates of gastrointestinal adverse reactions in patients of intravenous busulfan group and oral busulfan group were 22.7% and 66.6% respectively, and the incidence rates of oral rnucositis were 18.2% and 83.8% respectively. Additional drugs were not required and the plasma concentration of drug was steady. Conclusion Intravenous busulfan in conditioning therapy had confirmed efficacy with less side effect and it is superior to oral busulfan.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28