检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]中国人民解放军第163中心医院神经外科 [2]75105部队卫生队
出 处:《中国临床心理学杂志》2008年第4期387-388,386,共3页Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology
摘 要:目的:探讨高水平军事技术军人与一般军人执行功能的差异。方法:采用Stroop任务、连线测验、威斯康星卡片分类测验对一组军区技术比武尖子(研究组)和一组普通士兵(对照组)进行测量。结果:不一致条件下的Stroop错误数、连线A、连线B的时间两组存在显著差异,对照组高于研究组(P<0.05);两组在威斯康星卡片分类测验的持续性应答数、持续错误百分率上差异显著(P<0.01),两组在错误应答百分率上差异边缘显著(P=0.07),对照组高于研究组。结论:高水平军事技术军人的抑制控制、定势转移、认知灵活性等执行功能优于普通士兵。Objective: To study the executive functions of the top soldiers with excellent military skills. Methods: One group of top soldiers with excellent military skills and one group of common soldiers were tested by the Stroop task,the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test(WCST), and the Trail Making Test. Results: The top soldiers get significantly fewer errors in Stroop task, and spent significantly less time in Trail Making-A, Trail Making-B, and showed significantly fewer perservative responses(PR), and lower percent of perservative errors(PE%) than the common soldiers. Conclusion : The top soldiers with excellent military skills had higher level of executive functions,such as inhibitory control, and mental flexibility.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15