检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王明革[1]
出 处:《华北水利水电学院学报(社会科学版)》2008年第3期116-118,共3页Journal of North China Institute of Water Conservancy and Hydroelectric Power(Social Sciences Edition)
摘 要:把荣誉权与人格权、人身权、名誉权进行对比分析可以看出,荣誉权既不能简单地归类为人身权或人格权,也不能笼统地说荣誉权是名誉权的特殊情形。因为"特殊"一词有多种含义:"一般"和"超出一般常态的例外"间的并列关系中的特殊;"整体"和"特殊的局部"间的包容关系中的特殊;哲学意义上的"一般"和"特殊"关系中的特殊等。名誉权和荣誉权之间的关系应视为哲学意义上的一般和特殊的关系。因此,在民法中荣誉权应是名誉权下位阶的概念。Through comparing the concept of right of fame with that of right of reputation and personality right and status right,it can be seen that right of fame is unable simply to be classified as right of personality right or status right, neither can generally to con- sider right of fame as the unusual situation of right of reputation. Because this word "unusual" has many kinds of meanings: Peculiar; Special; Particular and so on. The relations between the right of reputation and the right of fame should be regarded as that of philosophie universality and philosophic parteularity. Therefore, the position of right of fame is lower than that of right of reputation in civil law.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.183