检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《四川医学》2008年第8期1020-1021,共2页Sichuan Medical Journal
摘 要:目的探讨酒精测试法与针刺法确定硬膜外麻醉平面的临床效果。方法分别用酒精棉签(方法Ⅰ)和一次性针头(方法Ⅱ)测定60例硬膜外麻醉患者的麻醉平面,同时观察测定部位皮肤表面的变化。结果两种方法确定硬膜外麻醉平面比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);方法Ⅰ麻醉平面出现的时间比方法Ⅱ早,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);方法Ⅱ患者皮肤有不同程度的红斑或出血点,方法Ⅰ患者皮肤表面未见异常。结论酒精测试法测定硬膜外麻醉平面比较针刺法优越,具有快速、准确、安全、无创、无痛等优点。Objective To investigate the clinical effects of alcohol testing methods and acupuncture methods on determine blocking levels of epidural anesthesia. Methods 60 patients were included as the object, take the alcohol cotton swab( method I ) and disposable aspiration needle (method Ⅱ) respectively to test the blocking levels of epidural anesthesia, meanwhile, observe the skin superficial change of the definited location, Results There were no statistical differences for the blocking levels of epidural anesthesia between the two methods( P 〉 0.05 ) ,but there was a significant difference ( P 〈 0.05 ) for the blocing levels of method I being more quick than method Ⅱ . Method Ⅱ induced erythema and bleeding point while method I did not. Conclusion Alcohol testing methods have significantly superiority in determine blocking levels of epidural anesthesia to compared with acupuncture methods, and alcohol testing methods possess the merit of quick, precise, safety,acceptability and so on.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222