中国人文社会科学著者的引文分析  

Citation Analysis of Authors in Chinese Humanities and Social Sciences

作　　者：邱均平[1] 熊尊妍[1] 

机构地区：[1]武汉大学中国科学评价研究中心,湖北武汉430072

出　　处：《现代情报》2008年第8期37-40,共4页Journal of Modern Information

基　　金：国家自然科学基金资助项目(70673071)

摘　　要：本文以《中国人文社会科学学术影响力报告(2000-2004)》中的学者被引统计作为数据来源,分析了各学科核心著者的被引与自引情况及其产生原因,并总结了各学科的特点。总的来说,发展历史长、应用性强的社会科学学科的论著被引量高、自引比例高而自引率较低;偏重理论研究、应用性不强的人文科学学科的论著被引量低、自引比例低而自引率较高;而且,人文社会科学著者自引率比自然科学要低。Based on the statistics of ＂A Report On the Academic Influence of the Research Achievements in Humanities and Social Sciences in China, 2000- 2004＂, the paper analyzed the author＇s citation and self- citation in different disciplines and the reasons of it, and summarized the characteristics of those disciplines. Generally speaking, disciplines of social sciences that have a long history and strong application were mostly higher in amount of citations and the proportion of author＇s self- citation, while lower in their self- citation rate; disciplines of humanities sciences that were prone to theoretical research and seak in application were mostly lower in amount of citations and the proportion of author＇s self- citation, but higher in their self- citation rate. Basides, author＇s self- citation rates in disciplines of humanities and social sciences were lower than natural sciences.

关 键 词：被引分析 自引分析 CSSCI 

分 类 号：G350[文化科学—情报学]