检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]武汉大学信息资源研究中心,湖北武汉430072 [2]武汉大学信息管理学院,湖北武汉430072
出 处:《重庆大学学报(社会科学版)》2008年第4期70-75,共6页Journal of Chongqing University(Social Science Edition)
基 金:国家自然科学基金项目"科技出版国际竞争力研究"(70573081)
摘 要:中国和印度作为世界公认的亚洲两个实力较为接近的发展中国家,有必要对其在科技、政治、军事等领域的差异作进一步的分析,以取长补短。学术期刊可以体现一个国家的科研竞争力,同时也是科学生产率的重要表现形式之一。因此,比较中国和印度学术期刊的相关情况具有一定的现实意义。文章主要选取中国和印度均被《期刊引证报告》(Journal Citation Reports,JCR)收录的期刊,通过比较各个期刊的各项指标以及这些期刊所涵盖的学科的基本情况,从而得出中国相对于印度在此类科技期刊上的优势和劣势。通过比较和分析,得出相关结论。Since China and India are considered as the two developing countries with closer strength in Asia, there exists a necessity to have a further analysis on the differences between these two countries in the fields of science, politics and military affairs. As we all have the conception in our mind, academic periodical is able to manifest scientific competitiveness of one country, and simultaneously an important manifestation form of scientific productivity. Therefore, a comparison of relative situations of academic periodical between China and India seems to take on practical significance. This article mainly choose the academic periodicals of China and India that are embodied by JCR and make a deeper analysis on every guide line of these journals and the subjects the embodied journals have covered so as to find out predominance and predominance of China. Through the comparison and analysis above, conclusions are given.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117