检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]东莞市石碣人民医院外科,523290 [2]中山大学附属三院胃肠外科
出 处:《中华普通外科学文献(电子版)》2008年第2期38-40,共3页Chinese Archives of General Surgery(Electronic Edition)
摘 要:目的评价术中冲洗在预防阑尾切口感染的作用。方法600例穿孔性阑尾炎随机分成三组。腹腔冲洗组189例(A组)、腹腔、腹壁肌冲洗组202例(B组)、腹腔、腹壁肌和皮肤三个层面冲洗组209例(C组),冲洗均用生理盐水及甲硝唑。术后观察三组切口感染情况。结果切口感染率A组为18.52%(35/189),B组为7.43%(15/202),C组为3.35%(7/209),三组差异有显著性(P<0.05)。结论腹腔、腹壁肌和皮肤三个层面清洁能显著降低阑尾切口感染率。Objective To evaluate the value of irrigating in operation to prevent infection of appendix incisional wound. Methods 600 cases of perforating appendicitis divided into three groups in random:abdominal cavity irrigating (A group,189 cases), abdominal cavity and abdominal wall irrigating 03 group, 202 cases), abdominal cavity, abdominal wall and skin three layers irrigating (C group, 209 cases ). In all cases irrigation liquid used normal saline and arilin. Postoperativeinfectionofincisionalwoundconditionwasobserved. Results Infection rate of incisional wound is 18.52%(35/189) in A group,7.43%(15/202) in B group,3.35%/(7/209) in C group. Comparing three groups the difference is significant ( P〈0.05 ). Conclusion Abdominalcavity, abdominal wall and skin three layers are all cleaned, which can reduce infection rate ofincisional wound.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.249