检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]北京国金恒信管理体系认证有限公司,北京100081
出 处:《中国卫生工程学》2008年第4期220-222,共3页Chinese Journal of Public Health Engineering
摘 要:目的分析某石化公司存在的职业病危害因素,评价采取的职业病防护措施效果。方法采用现场职业卫生调查、职业病危害因素检测和职业健康监护相结合的综合评价方法。结果该公司存在的职业病危害因素为硫磺粉尘、一氧化碳、二氧化硫、二氧化氮、氨、噪声等,检测值(TWA、STEL)分别为5.2、6.8;0.52、5.22;0.6、0.6;0.009、0.03;0.13、0.52ng/m3;68~89dB(A);硫化氢MAC〈0.53mg/m3,均符合国家标准。结论产生的职业病危害因素的浓度或强度均符合《工作场所有害因素职业接触限值》和《工业企业设计卫生标准》的要求。该公司采取的职业病防护措施是有效的。Objective To analyze and evaluate the occupational risk factors existed in the company and the effects of protective measures. Methods The comprehensive evaluation methods were combined with investigation of occupational health at the operating sites, detection on the occupational hazards and occupational health monitoring, Results Occupational hazard factors existed in the company were sulfur dust, carbon monoxide, sulfur dioxide, nitrogen dioxide, ammonia, ,which the values of TWA and STEL were 5.2,6. 8 ;0. 52,5.22 ;0. 6,0. 6 ;0. 009,0.03 ;0. 13,0. 52 mg/m3 ; the values of noise were 68 - 89 dB (A) ; MAC of sulfureted hydrogen was lower than 5.3 mg/ m3. Conclusion The concentrations (densities) of the occupational risk factors accorded with relative national standards. The protective measures adopted by the company are effective.
分 类 号:R135[医药卫生—劳动卫生] TE991[医药卫生—公共卫生与预防医学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3