东汉南朝文献中所见高句丽称貊问题探讨  

New Exploration of Call Gaojuli as Mo

作　　者：李俊方[1] 

机构地区：[1]上海师范大学古籍研究所,上海2000234

出　　处：《贵州民族研究》2008年第4期154-158,共5页Guizhou Ethnic Studies

摘　　要：关于高句丽的族源、族属问题,学术界有一种代表性观点,认为高句丽出自秽貊的族系,其根据为记载文献称高句丽为貊或秽貊,通过分析记载称高句丽为貊或秽貊的文献后,发现这里有一个共同的前提,即均为不友好或战争状态下的称谓,因此,我们可以看出称高句丽为貊是蔑称,这恰恰符合了时人貊言恶的思想观念。Considering Gaojuli＇ s source and belonging, Academic circles has one kind of representativeness viewpoint, which think Gaojuli come from ethnic lines of Huimo.they based on the historic records which called Gaojuli as Huimo or Mo. We try to analyze this record, find they have a presupposition, which is a call of unfriendly or during the war time .So call Gaojuli as Mo is a despise call and for North minorities, Mo always as a derogatory call, this in compliance with the use of the law and Confucius thought Mo as evil, people in that time all agreed his viewpoint.

关 键 词：高句丽 貊 言恶 

分 类 号：K23[历史地理—历史学]