值得重温的两种立宪主义学说  

Are They Worthy of Reviewing?——Study on Two Doctrines of Constitutionalism

作　　者：上官丕亮[1] 

机构地区：[1]苏州大学王健法学院副教授

出　　处：《法学家》2008年第4期15-19,共5页The Jurist

基　　金：韩大元教授主持的国家社科基金项目《中国宪法学说史研究》(07BFX071)的阶段性成果之一

摘　　要：一百年前的1908年,清朝政府在各种压力之下,权衡利弊,颁行了《钦定宪法大纲》,从而开创了中国立宪之路,同时也开启了中国的宪政之路。但是,"宪法"、"宪政"毕竟是"舶来品",在与中国特定国情相结合过程中,产生了种种的理论上的激烈争论;亦在实现宪政之路上出现了种种的曲曲折折。当然,中国要实现宪政、必然要实现宪政,这是历史之大势,浩浩荡荡,奋勇向前,应当是毋庸置疑的。在《钦定宪法大纲》颁行一百年之际,反思清末的立宪与中国的宪政之路,无疑是一件有意义的事情。One hundred years ago, the government of Qin dynasty issued The Outline of Constitution made by imperial order in 1908, under different pressures, and started the establishment of Constitution and the constitutionalism in China. But the 'Constitution' and the 'constitutionalism' are exotic in China after all. It came out many theoretic disputes in the process of applying it into Chinese practice. So it met many difficulties to achieve the constitutionalism. It is necessary and absolute to achieve the constitutionalism in historical perspectives. One hundred years have been passed since The Outline of Constitution made by imperial order was issued. So it is very meaningful to reconsider the establishment of Constitution of Qin dynasty and the road to Chinese constitutionalism.

关 键 词：立宪主义 学说 宪法监督 国家治理 政治制度 保障人权 国家权力 政治理想 

分 类 号：D911[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]