检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:沈勤炎[1]
机构地区:[1]江苏省原子医学研究所附属江原医院药剂科,无锡市214063
出 处:《中国医院用药评价与分析》2008年第7期522-523,共2页Evaluation and Analysis of Drug-use in Hospitals of China
摘 要:目的:评价二甲双胍缓释片不同联合用药方案治疗2型糖尿病的成本-效果。方法:56例患者分成3组,分别给予二甲双胍+吡格列酮+门冬胰岛素30(A组)、二甲双胍+阿卡波糖+诺和灵30R(B组)、二甲双胍+罗格列酮+诺和灵30R(C组)治疗2周,进行成本-效果分析。结果:总有效率各组间无显著差异,A、B、C组成本-效果比分别为413.2、426.2、492.8,B、C组相对于A组的增量成本-效果比分别为1147.0、-8875。结论:A方案为较佳选择。OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the cost - effectiveness of metformin sustained release tablets in combination with different drugs in the treatment of type 2 diabetes. METHODS: A total of 56 patients were enrolled and randomized to Group A (metformin + pioglitazone + novomix 30), Group B (metformin + acarbose + novolin 30)or Group C (metformin + rosiglitazone + novolin 30) . The cost- effectiveness of the 3 groups was evaluated after treatment for 2 weeks. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the total effective rate among 3 schemes. The cost- effectiveness ratios in scheme A, B and C were 413.2,426.2 and 492.8, respectively. The cost - effectiveness ratio increments in scheme B and C were 1 147.0 and -8 875.0 as against scheme A. CONCLUSION: Scheme A is the preferable choice among the 3 schemes.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117