检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陈盛[1] 吴晔明[1] 洪莉[1] 赵海腾[1] 王宇鹏[1]
机构地区:[1]上海儿童医学中心外科,200127
出 处:《临床小儿外科杂志》2008年第4期11-15,共5页Journal of Clinical Pediatric Surgery
基 金:2006年上海市卫生局基金资助项目;项目编号2006025
摘 要:目的客观呈现20年来一期手术关腹和Silo技术分期修复治疗的先天性腹裂患儿存活情况。方法检索相关数据库,对两种方法治疗的腹裂患儿的存活率进行Meta分析,比较其差异。结果Meta分析显示,1988~2007年一期关腹组术后存活率高于Silo分期修复组,敏感性分析结果与之一致。亚组分析显示,1988~1997年两组存活率差异无统计学意义,1998~2007年一期关腹组存活率高于Silo分期修复组。结论1988~2007年一期手术关腹患儿术后存活率高于Silo技术分期修复。由于病例分组存在选择偏倚,难以得出一期关腹效果优于Silo技术分期修复的结论。Objective To present the survival rate of gastroschisis treated by primary closure (PC) and Silo staged closure (SC) in 1988 - 2007 by means of a systematic review. Methods Search related databases, do a meta-analysis on the survival rate of gastroschisis treated by these two methods, and compare the difference. Results Meta-analysis shows PC group has a higher survival rate than SC group in 1988 - 2007.Sensitive analysis has the same resuh.Subgroup analysis shows there is no statistical significance of survival rate in these two groups in 1988- 1997, but PC group has a higher survival rate than SC group in 1998-2007.Conclusious PC group has a higher survival rate than SC group in 1988 - 2007.But we can't conclude that PC is more effective than SC because of the selection bias.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.141.107.132