检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]上海市第八人民医院骨科,上海200235 [2]上海交通大学附属第六人民医院骨科
出 处:《脊柱外科杂志》2008年第4期221-223,共3页Journal of Spinal Surgery
摘 要:目的探讨应用后路椎弓根螺钉固定加椎体间植骨融合术治疗复发性腰椎间盘突出症的临床效果。方法2004年7月~2007年10月对20例复发性腰椎间盘突出症患者应用后路扩大椎板切除神经减压+椎弓根螺钉固定,联合自体骨填塞Cage行椎间融合术进行再手术治疗,应用目测类比疼痛评分法(VAS)及ODI功能障碍指数进行术后疗效评定。结果随访时间为6~36个月,平均13.6个月,所有患者腰腿痛症状得到有效缓解,椎间植骨融合良好,无断钉及融合器移位等并发症。结论椎弓根螺钉系统联合椎间融合器是治疗复发性腰椎间盘突出症较理想方法,它可同时进行神经根减压及重建腰椎稳定性。Objective To study the clinical effect of posterior pedicle screw fixation and intervertebral fusion for the surgical treatment of recurrent lumbar intervertebral disc protrusion. Methods From July 2004 to Oct. 2007, 20 patients with recurrent lumbar intervertebral disc protrusion underwent reoperation with broadening posterior nerve root decompression, pedicle screw fixation and interbedy fusion with cage. The effect of the operation was evaluated by visual analogy scale(VAS) and Oswestry disability index(ODI) post-operatively. Results The average follow-up time was 13.6 monthS (from 6 to 36 months). The backleg pain of all the cases were relieved effectively. The interbedy fusion was well without screws breakage or loosing. Conclusion Pedicle screw fixation and intervertebral fusion with cage was a good technique for the recurrent lumbar intervertebral disc protrusion that can decompress nerve root and reconstruct lumbar spine stability at one time.
分 类 号:R681.533.1[医药卫生—骨科学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28