隐名代理制度新议——从两大法系对比中研究《合同法》402条之规定  

NEW ILLUSTRATION OF ANONYMOUS AGENCY SYSTEM——RESEARCH ON ARTICLE 402 IN "CONTRACT LAW" FROM TWO LAW FAMILIES BY COMPARISON

作　　者：许文峰[1] 

机构地区：[1]广州航海高等专科学校港口与航运管理系,广东广州510725

出　　处：《广州航海高等专科学校学报》2008年第3期58-60,共3页Journal of Guangzhou Maritime College

基　　金：广州航海高等专科学校哲学社会科学科研基金资助项目(K3712B12)

摘　　要：论述隐名代理在大陆法系和普通法系中的不同的理论观点、法律规定,在此基础上探讨其不同的法理基础;阐述隐名代理的基本法律内涵;对我国隐名代理制度适用的问题进行了分析论证;探讨委托人直接介入权与第三人选择权在《合同法》402条中的行使条件、法律后果;并提出大胆借鉴普通法系隐名代理制度的同时,必须保持我国法系的完整.This paper aims at making an analysis of different theoretic viewpoints and legal regulations concerning anonymous agency in continental legal system and common law system, and then goes forward to discussing their different jurisprudential basis. Also, the author presents the basic legal connotation of anonymous agency and analyzes and demonstrates the issues to which the anonymous agency system can be applied. Besides, based on the Article 402 in ＂Contract Law＂, the author probes to the different premises and legal consequences of carrying out the self-entering right of client and the option right of the third party. At the end of this paper, the author puts forward a conclusion that we should make use of anonymous agency system in common law system as a reference as well as maintain the integrality of our law system.

关 键 词：隐名代理 间接代理 《合同法》 代理制度 两大法系 

分 类 号：G923.6[文化科学]