重构公共政策评估——基于公民权与行政权相对平衡的分析  

Reinventing Public Policy Evaluation:A Comparatively Balanced Analysis of Citizenship and Administrative Powers

作　　者：姜国兵[1] 蓝光喜[2,3] 

机构地区：[1]华南农业大学公共管理学院,讲师广州510642 [2]<求实> [3]<江西行政学院学报>,副主编南昌330000

出　　处：《中国行政管理》2008年第8期50-53,共4页Chinese Public Administration

摘　　要：对公共政策进行评估,形式上是对政策方案执行前、执行中和执行后的评价,实质上则是行政权与公民权的再分配。本文从公共政策过程出发,以公民权与行政权相对平衡为分析框架,将公共决策事前评估的重点安排为公民权比重大于行政权,这是确定一种公民本位的制度安排;将公共决策事中评估的重点安排为行政权比重大于公民权,是以最少的时间和成本实现这一制度安排;将公共决策事后评估的重点安排为公民权比重等于行政权,是因为行政权与公民权的和谐相处可以避免公共政策自身运作的损耗,使其沿着正确轨道良性健康进行,并为新一轮的公共政策发挥创造良好环境和基础。Public policy evaluation consists of pre-evaluation, process evaluation and post- evaluation. Substantially it reassigns citizenship and administrative powers. This article discusses the public policy process regarding the framework of the balance between citizenship and administrative powers. It considers the keystone of pre-evaluation is citizenship which weights more than administrative powers. In the process evaluation, administrative powers weights more than citizenship. Finally, in the post- evaluation, citizenship is as important as administrative powers.

关 键 词：政策评估 公民权 行政权 

分 类 号：D922.1[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]