检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]赣南医学院附属市立医院赣州市立医院内分泌科,江西赣州341000
出 处:《赣南医学院学报》2008年第4期567-568,共2页JOURNAL OF GANNAN MEDICAL UNIVERSITY
摘 要:目的:探讨肥胖和非肥胖糖耐量受损(IGT)患者血清CRP表达的差异和临床意义。方法:117例IGT患者和68例正常糖耐量(NGT)对照组按BM I≥25kg/m2和BM I<23 kg/m2分为肥胖组与非肥胖组,以免疫散射比浊法测定CRP并加以比较。结果:CRP水平IGT组和NGT组各自组内比较,肥胖者均较非肥胖者高(P<0.05);组间比较,IGT组较NGT组CRP水平在肥胖者和非肥胖者均增高,差异显著(P<0.01)。结论:IGT患者较NGT患者,肥胖较非肥胖者的炎症因子表达更显著。Objective:To discuss the difference in C -reactive protein(CRP) in peripheral blood of impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) patients with or without obesity. Methods: 117 IGT patients and 68 normal glucose tolerance(NGT) patients control group were divided into obesity group( BMI≥25kg/m^2) and non- obesity group( BMI 〈 23 kg/m^2). The level of CRP was dectected by turbidimetric immunoassay . Results: The level of CRP in obesity subjects was significant higher than that in non - obesity subjects in both IGT group and control group ( P 〈 0.05 ). The level of CRP in Obesity and non - obesity subjects in IGT group were significant higher than NGT group(P 〈 0.01 ). Conclusion:IGT patients and obesity subjects have more significance in C -reactive protein(CRP) expression than NGT patients and non - obesity subjects, respectively.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15