检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]苏州大学法学院,江苏苏州215006 [2]浙江省温州市瓯海区卫生监督所,浙江温州325005
出 处:《河南司法警官职业学院学报》2008年第3期40-44,共5页Journal of Henan Judicial Police Vocational College
基 金:江苏省高校2008年哲学社会科学研究项目"公共行政民营化法律问题研究"的阶段性成果之一
摘 要:治安承包是公共行政民营化浪潮在当下中国特定行政领域中的制度表征,相关争议的焦点在于公共行政民营化界限的判断。国家职能、行政过程及法律保留是影响民营化界限的三大主要因素。以合同承包为代表的形式民营化举措并未改变政府责任,能够得到广泛运用;以政府撤资为代表的实质民营化举措导致政府责任的移转,仅适用于需要完全市场化的公共行政事务;介于两者之间的政府淡出形式,可以在政府占垄断地位的行政事务范围内广泛采用。The contract for undertaking public security is the system attribute of Chinese specific administrative domain in the public administration privatization tide nowadays.It's related disputes focus on the judgment of public administration privatization boundary.The state function,the administrative process and the legal retention are the three main factors which influence upon dividing the privatization boundary.The contract for undertaking public administration has not changed the government responsibilities which can be modeled.Disinvesting of the government will result in the shifting of responsibilities,which is only suitable for some public administrative affairs that need operating completely in market.The third fade-out way which lies between the above mentioned two could find vast use in administrative affairs monopolized by government.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.249