检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]华南农业大学,广东广州510642
出 处:《河南司法警官职业学院学报》2008年第3期97-100,共4页Journal of Henan Judicial Police Vocational College
摘 要:最密切联系原则发端于英美法系国家的司法实践,而在世界范围内得到了热烈响应,它的适当性基础在于其恰当地在立法者和司法者之间分享了法律选择的权力,使法律选择的过程更为合理。但它又同时兼具过于灵活和不够灵活的缺陷,需要以"两度法律选择"和"更密切联系"模式对之进行矫正。Originating from countries of Great Britain and American legal system,the principle of the most significant relationship has gained universal popularity,which give proper and different power between the law maker and the judicial,but it also has two major weaknesses: one is that it is too flexible,the other is that it isn't flexible enough.Only by the proper use of this principle may we choose more proper applicable law.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.135.237.153