检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]成都理工大学,四川成都610059
出 处:《安徽农业科学》2008年第25期11013-11016,共4页Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences
基 金:高等学校博士学科点专项科研基金(20060616020)项目;四川省内江市白马镇土地整理区农业地质调查项目(J-17)
摘 要:不同的重金属元素具有不同的毒性。传统的模糊数学污染物浓度超标赋权法未考虑重金属自身的毒性,不能反映元素的实际生态效应。在模糊数学综合评价基础上,将重金属的毒性纳入权重考虑,通过污染物浓度超标赋权法、毒性响应系数反推指数赋权法和重金属毒性大小排序赋权法的模糊综合评价结果与潜在生态危害指数评价结果比较,研究表明毒性响应系数反推指数赋权法的评价结果更能真实准确地反映实际结果。Various heavy metals have different toxicity. Traditional fuzzy matheruatics exceeding standard weighting method of pollutant concentration hasn' t taken the toxicity of heavy metals into account and couldn' t reflect the actual ecological effect of elements. Based on fuzzy mathematics comprehensive evaluation, the toxicity of heavy metals was taken into account. The fuzzy comprehensive evaluation results by pollutant concentration exceeding standard weighting method, toxic response coefficient back-stepping index weighting method and heavy metal toxicity sorting weighting method were compared with the potential ecological risk evaluation results. The research results showed that the evaluation results by toxic response coefficient back-stepping index weighting method could reflect the actual results more truly and accurately.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222