检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:齐风杰[1] 李锦文[1] 魏化震[1] 张俊华[1]
机构地区:[1]中国兵器工业集团第五三研究所,济南250031
出 处:《纤维复合材料》2008年第3期50-52,共3页Fiber Composites
摘 要:本文采用GPC和TG对高残碳酚醛树脂(HCYPR)和硼酚醛树脂(BPR)的分子量及其分布、热失重特性进行了表征和对比。同时对比了S-2GFC/HCYPR和S-2GFC/BPR的力学性能和烧蚀性能。研究结果发现:与HCYPR相比,BPR的分子量更小,分布宽度更窄,与增强体的浸润性更好;BPR的800℃残碳率高于HCYPR;S-2GFC/HCYPR的质量烧蚀率要大于S-2GFC/BPR,但线烧蚀率小于后者。S-2GFC/BPR比S-2GFC/HCYPR强度的提高百分数从59.4%到73.9%不等,其中压缩强度提高了73.9%;模量的提高百分数从27.5%到31.9%不等,其中弯曲模量提高了31.9%。Molecular weight, molecular weight distribution, and thennal loss of high char yield phenolic resin and Boron - phenolic resin were characterized and compared by GPC and TG. In the meantime, ablative properties and mechanical properties were compared between S - 2GFC/HCYPR and S - 2GFC/BPR. The results showed that Boron - phenolic resin had less molecular weight, less dispersity, better immersion capacity. In comparison with HCYPR, BPR had bigger Char yield at 800℃. Mass abla- tion rate of S - 2GFC/HCYPR was bigger than S - 2GFC/BPR, but linear ablation rate was less than the latter. Mechanical strength of S- 2GFC/BPR composites is better than that of S- 2GFC/HCYPR composites, ranging from 59.4% to 73.9%, of which compressive strength is 73.9% while Mechanical module of S - 2GFC/BPR composites is better than that of S - 2GFC/ HCYPR composites, ranging from 27.5% to 31.9%, of which flexual module is 31.9%.
分 类 号:TB332[一般工业技术—材料科学与工程]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222