检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:郭剑虹[1] 许实燕[1] 陈雪华[1] 吴妙桓[1] 邱秀珊[1]
出 处:《现代临床护理》2008年第8期12-14,54,共4页Modern Clinical Nursing
基 金:广东省潮州市科技计划项目;项目编号2007S17
摘 要:目的对电动洗胃机洗胃法进行改良,以提高洗胃质量。方法将86例口服有机磷农药实施电动洗胃机洗胃的患者随机分为实验组和对照组,各43例。实验组采用改良洗胃法,对照组采用传统法。对两组间洗胃质量进行比较。结果两组在洗胃时间和洗胃液总量、洗胃过程顺利与否、胃黏膜出血情况的比较,差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。结论改良后的洗胃法可更有效固定胃管、清除毒物、缩短洗胃时间,并能防止洗胃术中及术后呕吐的发生。Objective To study the clinical effect of the improved gastric lavage with electrostomach irrigator. Methods 86 cases poisoned by organphosphorus pesticide were randomly divided into two groups in equal number. The experiment group was treated with the improved gastric lavage with electrostomach irrigator, and the control group with traditional method. The clinical effects of the two groups were studied and compared. Result In comparison of the two groups, the differences were significant in time and volume of gastric lavage, the process of gastric lavage and complications ( all P 〈 0.05). Conclusion The improved gastric lavage with electrostomach irrigator is more effective in fixing gastric tube, clearing poisons, shortening lavage time, and even preventing the complication of lavage.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145