检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]中国石油大学(华东)人文社科学院,山东东营257061
出 处:《济宁学院学报》2008年第4期5-9,共5页Journal of Jining University
摘 要:公平与效率是人类追求的两大目标。中国头产党在各个历史时期都在为实现公平条件下的快速发展而奋斗。毛泽东确信经济效率与分配公平之间能够实现统一,这一思想在20世纪50—70年代造成了重大的实践后果;邓小平继承了马克思主义关于效率公平的基本观点,从社会制度的高度来认识效率与公平问题。在社会主义初级阶段。他强调效率已成为矛盾的主要方面。效率原则应该被奉为优先原则;当前时代发展凸现诸多的社会问题,从而使公平与效率问题成为一个理论聚焦点和必须加以认真对待的问题。同样,比较毛泽东和邓小平的公平效率现也具有深远的现实意义。The equity and efficiency are the two greatest targets what are pursued by the human race, and developing quickly and fairly is the everlasting goal of CPC. Mao Zedong made sure there would be a balance between the efficiency of economic growth and the equity of distribution, and his thought had the important effect on the CPC' s work from1950s to 1970s. Deng Xiaoping inherited the Marxist basic standpoints on equity and efficiency, and he thought of the question from the high of social institution. What' s more, he emphasized that the efficiency had become the main aspect of the antinomy, and the efficiency would preempt the equity during the primary stage of socialism. We must face more and more social problem now, as a result, the rela- tion between equity and efficiency became the focus argued by social scientist, and became the problem must be answered by CPC. Comparing Mao Zedong's views of equity and efficiency with Deng Xiaoping's is a valuable job.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.195