轧染/冷堆/湿短蒸染色工艺对比  

Comparisons among pad dyeing,cold pad-batch dyeing and wet short-steaming dyeing

作　　者：孙臣[1] 李春光[1] 苏长志[1] 尹灵仙[1] 

机构地区：[1]华纺股份有限公司技术中心,山东滨州256617

出　　处：《印染》2008年第19期18-19,共2页China Dyeing and Finishing

摘　　要：对目前印染厂常见的三种棉织物活性染料染色工艺,包括连续染色法、冷轧堆染色法和湿短蒸染色法进行了工艺条件和成本分析。发现湿短蒸工艺在成本上最具优势,但必须进行严格的在线测量,以及工艺自动控制,连续染色能耗相对较大。The common three reactive dyeing processes of cotton fabric were introduced, such as continuous dyeing, cold padbatch dyeing and wet short-steaming dyeing, production cost of these three processes were analyzed. It was said that wet short-steaming process had the best advantage in production cost, but online measuring and automatic control of process were a must; continuous dyeing was the most popular process, but energy consumption was the highest.

关 键 词：连续染色 冷轧堆法 湿蒸 短流程 成本 

分 类 号：TS193.632[轻工技术与工程—纺织化学与染整工程]