检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]同济大学航空航天与力学学院
出 处:《空气动力学学报》2008年第3期317-321,328,共6页Acta Aerodynamica Sinica
基 金:上海市重点学科建设项目资助(项目编号:B302)
摘 要:要准确模拟低矮建筑物壁面上分离涡位置的平均风压比较困难,这些区域在绕钝体流动中也是很关键的部位。本文在Spalart-Allamaras湍流物理模型的基础上,根据钝体绕流流场特性,结合低矮建筑物上的实测数据,调试并选取合适的参数,提高涡粘预测的准确性,提出了改进的S-A湍流物理模型。通过对6m立方体和Silsoe低矮建筑模型进行稳态数值模拟,由改进S-A湍流模型得到的屋面、背风和侧风面上平均风压结果,比目前公认的模拟钝体绕流效果较好的SST湍流模型有较大改善,比风洞实验更接近实测结果。由此可以看出,本文改进湍流模型的方法,将是一条提高预测建筑物表面平均风压精度很有效的途径。It is difficult to predict mean wind loads accurately in the separated flow region on the low-rise buildings by CFD, especially in the roof and rear of the buildings. This paper presents an improved turbulence model based on Spalart-Allamaras model. According to wind flow characteristic and full-scale pressure data on low-rise buildings some variables are adopted to improve the accuracy of turbulence model for calculation of wind pressures. The eddy viscosity could be predicted accurately with some appropriate parameters in the improved turbulence model. The improved Spalart-Allamaras model is applied to two full-scale models, 6m cube and Silsoe Structure Building. The mean pressures on the roof and rear of the buildings are compared with field-measurement data, wind-tunnel data and numerical results using some other turbulences models. The improved Spalart-Allamaras model can get the best results compared to full-scale data. So improving the turbulence model based on full-scale data could be an efficient way to predict mean wind loads accurately.
分 类 号:V211[航空宇航科学与技术—航空宇航推进理论与工程] TU312.1[建筑科学—结构工程]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.219