不同垫料对雏鸵鸟育雏效果的研究  

Effect of Different Underpads on Ostrich Brooding

作　　者：张勇[1] 任战军[1] 王磊[1] 李庆芝[1] 申芳丽[1] 杨选民 徐启华 

机构地区：[1]西北农林科技大学动物科技学院,陕西杨凌712100 [2]陕西英考鸵鸟股份有限公司杨凌鸵鸟示范中心,陕西杨凌712100 [3]陕西英考官池鸵鸟繁育中心,陕西大荔715106

出　　处：《西北农业学报》2008年第5期47-50,共4页Acta Agriculturae Boreali-occidentalis Sinica

基　　金：陕西省农业攻关项目(2005k01-G7-02)

摘　　要：为了提高雏鸵鸟成活率、减少发病率,使雏鸵鸟健康成长,在育雏模式相同的条件下,对连续4批雏鸵鸟进行沙炕和泥炕2种不同垫料各为期20 d的饲养对比试验。结果表明,4批用沙炕育雏的雏鸵鸟平均日增重86.67±22.0 g,发病率10.67%,成活率90.37%,泥炕育雏的雏鸟平均日增重72.84±21.79 g,发病率18.33%,成活率85.03%,沙炕与泥炕平均日增重、发病率、成活率差异显著(P<0.05)。根据4批试验结果可知沙炕和泥炕都是目前投资比较小、易推广的育雏垫料,但沙炕在鸵鸟增重效果、成活率、保温效果上都较泥炕好。In order to improve survival rate of ostrich nestling and reduce incidence of a disease and make ostrich nestling healthly pullulation,4 continuous batches ostrich nestling were bred on sand kang and mud kang respectively 20 days in experiment.The result indicated： the average daily gain,incidence of a disease and survival rate of batch nestling bred on sand kang and mud kang were respectively 86.67±22.0g,10.67%,90.37% and.72.84±21.79g,18.33%,85.03%,difference significant（P〈0.05）.The study demonstrated that the sand kang and the mud kang were both brooding underpads with low cost and easy generalization,but the sand kang was better than mud kang with good heat preservation,weight gain effect and survival rate.

关 键 词：不同垫料 雏鸵鸟 育雏效果 

分 类 号：S839[农业科学—畜牧学]