中国参与联合国禁止酷刑规范的制度分析  

Institutional Analysis of China's Participation in UN Regulations against Torture

作　　者：刘贞晔[1] 

机构地区：[1]中国政法大学政治与公共管理学院,北京102249

出　　处：《教学与研究》2008年第9期52-58,共7页Teaching and Research

基　　金：国家社科基金一般项目“国际关系民主化与联合国改革”(项目编号:05BGJ019)的成果之一

摘　　要：自20世纪80年代中国加入联合国禁止酷刑规范体系以来,中国就积极加入了相关国际公约,广泛开展了与世界各国和地区及联合国禁止酷刑工作机构的合作,加快了国内行政立法司法体系改革。对于中国参与禁止酷刑规范的原因和动力的解释,学界主要有"策略论"、"刺激—反应论"、"有利论"等几种观点,但都因偏于简单的"预期结果逻辑"推理而缺乏足够的解释力。本文依据社会学制度主义的"社会适应性逻辑",从制度为参与者提供的"意义架构"、"认知向度"、"社会合法性"、共享议题网络的"认知地图"以及制度与参与者之间的"同构性特征"等五个方面对上述问题做出了新的解释。Ever since the entry into the UN System of Regulations against Torture,China has been actively involved in related international conventions, and cooperated with UN institutions against torture and similar organizations of various countries and regions in the world. The steps of reform in the system of administration, legislation and justice are quickened. There have been three different interpretations in the academic circle about the causes and motives for China to participate in regulations against tortures, namely, the strategy theory, the stimulus-response theory, and the beneficial theory. However, all three tend to reason on the simple expected results logic and are not sufficiently persuasive. This paper attempts to refer to the theory of social adaptive logic of sociological institutionalism to offer a new interpretation by analyzing five aspects the institution provides for the participants, namely, meaning construct, cognitive dimension, social legitimacy, the cognitive map about the shared issue network, and common characters of the participants.

关 键 词：联合国禁止酷刑规范 中国参与 社会学制度主义 “社会适应性逻辑” 

分 类 号：D99[政治法律—国际法学]