检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:郭斌[1] 谢思静[2] 安振梅[3] 阙克华[1] 杨帆[1] 刘静[1] 周学东[1]
机构地区:[1]口腔疾病研究国家重点实验室,四川大学,四川成都610041 [2]南京大学医学院附属口腔医院牙体牙髓病科,江苏南京210093 [3]四川大学华西医院内分泌科,四川成都610041
出 处:《国际口腔医学杂志》2008年第5期494-496,共3页International Journal of Stomatology
基 金:四川省科技厅科技攻关资助项目(05SG022-019-4);四川省科技厅重点科技攻关资助项目(2007SGY024)
摘 要:目的比较老年2型糖尿病患者与健康老年人非刺激性唾液分泌率和唾液葡萄糖的质量浓度,从宿主因素方面评价老年糖尿病患者的患龋风险。方法随机筛选四川大学华西医院内分泌科住院部老年2型糖尿病患者20例(糖尿病组)、健康老年人20例(对照组),收集其5 min非刺激性唾液,计算唾液分泌率并测定其葡萄糖的质量浓度。结果糖尿病组非刺激性唾液分泌率与对照组无明显差异(P>0.05);糖尿病组唾液葡萄糖的质量浓度大于对照组,且差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论老年2型糖尿病患者唾液葡萄糖的质量浓度较健康老年人高。Objective The aim of this study was to compare and analyse the unstimulated saliva flow rate (SF,) and saliva glucose mass concentration(SGc) in the diabetic and the healthy elders. Methods The study comprised randomly sampled 20 type 2 diabetic aged in patients from West China Hospital of Sichuan University (diabetic group), 20 age- and gender-matched healthy aged people(control group). Saliva was tested for unstimulated flow rate and glucose mass concentration. Results There were no significant differences in SFr between the diabetic and control group (P〉0.05). The diabetic group had statistically higher SGo than the control (P〈0.05). Conclusion The saliva glucose mass concentration of aged diabetic people increases, compared with the healthy.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.48