The Chinese occupational certificate： Research on the freedom of occupation in Germany constitution  

从德国职业自由权的宪法保护看中国职业资格制度

作　　者：何丽杭 

机构地区：[1]德国慕尼黑大学法学院,慕尼黑80539

出　　处：《US-China Law Review》2008年第7期46-50,共5页美中法律评论（英文版）

摘　　要：Education and work are the two important things that the Chinese concern because it＇s about their life. For getting a better chance in the job market people try to get different certificates. College students take English tests, people in financial branch take the accountant-test, people who want to be a lawyer take the national judicature-test. Even the babysitter make their own tests. The classrooms are full with those people who come after work to learn for the tests. But which tests and certificates are really necessary？ This article will research on the certificates in China in constitutional protection and compare that with the system of the vocational education in German.教育和就业是当前人们最关心的两大话题，因为它们关系到生计。为了在劳动力市场上获得更好的机会，各类资格证书成为谋职者的新宠，大学生热衷的英语证书，金融机构的会计证书，法律机构的司法考试证书，甚至连照顾产妇的月嫂都有相应的母婴护理证书。晚上和双休日各类培训学校人满为患。但是诸多证书中究竟有多少是国家规定应取得的，证书的含金量有多少，似乎不被人们所关注。本文试固从宪法保护的职业自由全角度探讨中国现有的职业资格制度，并与职业教育发达的德国进行比较，浅论完善的可能性。

关 键 词：freedom of occupation occupational certificate protection of constitution public interest 

分 类 号：D921[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学] C975[政治法律—法学]