检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]哈尔滨师范大学生命与环境科学学院,中国黑龙江哈尔滨150080 [2]哈尔滨商业大学旅游烹饪学院,黑龙江哈尔滨150076
出 处:《经济地理》2008年第5期876-881,共6页Economic Geography
基 金:黑龙江省社会科学基金项目(编号:06D036);黑龙江省教育厅人文社会科学研究项目(编号:11522039)联合资助
摘 要:文章应用区域旅游竞争力数字化评价体系,采用近年来国家和地区实际统计数据,提出我国区域旅游竞争力分布格局,并给出了合理性说明。结果表明:我国31个省(市)区域旅游竞争力差距显著,等级明显,分布格局清晰;全国可分为五个集团、三大层次,各集团和层次旅游竞争力水平明显呈梯型分布;三大层次中各层次所包含的省(市)数目与在全国竞争力中所占的份量明显不成比例,第一层次优势明显突出;中间层次为旅游经济发展中地区,成员庞大但落后较为明显,是决定我国旅游竞争力整体发展水平的关键,也是今后应重点剖析和研究的对象。The concrete pattern of the regional tourism competitive capability in China is presented using the digitized evaluation system of the regional tourism competitive capability proposed by author and the official statistic data in China in recent years. The calculation results indicate: (1) The regional tourism competitive capability of 31 provinces and cities in China show different grades and the concrete pattern is clear; (2) The concrete pattern of national tourism competitive capability can be divided into five groups and three grades with the ladder forms; (3) The number of the provinces and cities in the three grades is out ofpropogion with the regional tourism competitive capability in the three grades and the superiority of the first grade is obvious; (4)The intermediate grade (fourth group) in the three grades, as the tourism developing area, is the key to determine the whole level of the national tourism competitive capability and should be discussed more carefully later.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15