检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:梁志文[1]
出 处:《国家检察官学院学报》2008年第5期137-145,共9页Journal of National Prosecutors College
摘 要:权利人通过合同执行区别定价策略来获取知识产权法下难以获得的利益,属于权利的私人定制。权利人通过合同对知识产权权利限制制度予以反限制、对知识产权法不保护的客体提供保护、对知识产权进行知识产权法之外的限制,这些合同条款可否执行需要我们谨慎考虑其合法性。通过合同执行区别定价既有可能具有激励创新之效应,也有可能存在对公共利益侵蚀之威胁,因此需要在利益平衡原则的指导下,以合同法维护契约正义的制度为核心来考虑这些合同条款是否违反了知识产权法的强制性规定、是否属于排除对方主要权利的格式合同、是否属于显失公平之情形。It is a kind of individualization of right that the right owner obtains interests difficult to gain within the intellectual property (IP) law by a contract with price discrimination. The clauses in such contract break the limitation on IP right, protect the objects beyond the protection scope of the IP law, and restrict the IP with measures out of the IP law; while the legitimacy of which should be cautiously considered to determine whether they are performable. To execute the price discrimination by contract may not only inspire innovation but also be in danger of encroach public interests, therefore, the principle of balance of interests and contractual jiustice should be employed to estimate whether the contract clauses violate imperative rules of the IP law, compose a format contract excluding main rights of opposite party, or appear obviously unfair.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.221.40.152