检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:申勇[1]
机构地区:[1]四川省成都市龙泉驿区第一人民医院,610100
出 处:《内蒙古中医药》2008年第9期13-14,共2页Inner Mongolia Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine
摘 要:目的:比较异位妊娠腹腔镜与剖腹保守手术治疗的价值。方法:回顾性分析方法,对异位妊娠患者行腹腔镜与剖腹保守手术治疗的临床资料各231例在术中及术后情况进行分析。结果:腹腔镜组与剖腹手术组在手术时间、术中出血、术后的起床时间、肛门的排气时间、平均住院天数、伤口愈合情况等方面有明显差异(P<0.01)。结论:腹腔镜组进行异位妊娠保守手术的治疗具有创伤小,恢复快,并发症少等而优于传统剖腹保守手术治疗组。Objective : To compare the clinical outcome of laparoscopic controlled with laparotomy in the treatment of ectopie pregnancy. Methods: A retrospective study was carried out to analyze intra-- and post--operative parameters between laparoscope surgery and laparotomy as treatment of ectopic pregnancy,each 231 patients with ectopic pregnancy. Results: There was significant difference between laparoscope group and laparotomy group in operative time,intraoperative hemorrhage, the length of sickbed, postoperative anus exhaust, average days of hospitalization, situation of wound healing(P〈0. 01) Conclusion : Laparoscopic group ectopic pregnancy conservative surgical treatment of trauma and rapid recovery, fewer complications, such as Caesarean section and is superior to the traditional conservative treatment group.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.249