检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:宁波[1] 李一粟[1] 马宇洁[1] 马建珍[1] 刘涛[1]
机构地区:[1]空军总医院,第四军医大学空军医学院,北京100036
出 处:《中国危重病急救医学》2008年第10期618-620,共3页Chinese Critical Care Medicine
摘 要:目的观察肺复张(RM)对老年患者重大手术后肺不张及肺部感染的预防作用并评价其安全性。方法选择2007年2月-2008年2月北京空军总医院重症加强治疗病房(ICU)收治的70岁以上老年患者40例,均为重大手术后,全麻手术持续6h以上,麻醉、肌松状态入ICU,均为有创动脉压监测。随机分为RM试验组和非RM对照组,RM条件为吸入氧浓度0.60,呼吸频率20次/min,潮气量5ml/kg,呼气末正压25cmH2O(1cmH2O=0.098kPa),吸呼比1:2,持续30S,1h后重复1次。记录RM前、后2min及RM实施过程中心率(HR)、中心静脉压(CVP)、平均动脉压(MAP)、气道平台压(Pplat)、脉搏血氧饱和度(SpO2)的变化;RM前及末次RM1h后进行动脉血气分析;观察两组患者肺不张及肺部感染发生情况。结果①RM操作中HR、MAP、CVP有显著变化(P均〈0.05),但未影响循环功能。②RM后2min CVP迅速恢复,RM操作前后比较HR、MAP、CVP、SpO2变化不明显(P均〉0.05);RM后Pplat显著降低(P〈0.05)。③RM组实施RM后肺不张、肺部感染的发生率均显著低于非RM组(P均〈0.05)。④RM后氧合指数较前变化明显(P〈0.05)。结论RM可预防老年患者重大手术后肺不张及肺部感染的发生,RM在老年患者中使用较安全,并可明显改善老年患者氧合指数。Objective To study the effect of recruitment maneuver (RM) in preventing atelectasis and lung injury in elderly patients after major operations, and to evaluate the safety of RMs. Methods Forty elderly patients after major operations were admitted to intensive care unit (ICU) of Beijing Air Force General Hospital from February 2007 to February 2008 were randomized into RM group and control group. The patients were still under the effect of anesthesia and muscle relaxation when admitted. All of them were under invasive blood pressure monitoring, which was continued for over 6 hours. RM was conducted by regulating inspired oxygen concentration (FiO2) to 0.60, respiratory rate 20/min, tidal volume (VT) 5 ml/kg, with 25 em H2O (1 cm H2O= 0. 098 kPa) of continuous positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) for 30 seconds, and then the previous ventilator setting was resumed. The above modality was repeated once after 1 hour. Heart rate (HR), central venous pressure (CVP), mean arterial pressure (MAP), platform airway pressure (Pplat), percutaneous oxygen saturation (SpO2) were measured before and after the RM. Arterial blood gas analysis was done before and after RMs. The presence of pulmonary atelectasis or pulmonary infection was looked for after RMs. Results (1)There were significant changes in HR, CVP and MAP during RM (all P〈0.05), circulation function was not affected. (2)There were no significant changes in HR, MAP, CVP and SpO2 before and after RMs (all P〈0.05). Pplat was significantly reduced after RMs (P〈0.05). (3)The incidence of pulmonary atelectasis or pulmonary infection was significantly lower in RM group (both P〈0.05). (4)Oxygenation index (PaO/FiO2) in RM group was significant increased (P〈0.05). Conclusion RM is safe when used in elderly patients. It can significantly improve oxygenation in elderly patients.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3