检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:曹允希[1] 刘慧琴[1] 邱建峰[1] 何乐民[1] 韩丰谈[1] 景学安[2]
机构地区:[1]泰山医学院放射学部,泰安271016 [2]泰山医学院基础医学部,泰安271016
出 处:《中华放射学杂志》2008年第10期1056-1058,共3页Chinese Journal of Radiology
摘 要:目的观察数字X线摄影(DR)系统不同曝光量与影像质量的关系。方法选择摄影管电压90kV、曝光量从0.5~16.0mAs变化时,使用X线摄影系统对Cdrad2.0对比度细节体模进行曝光,观察者对显示器的影像进行阅读,计算其影像质量因子(IQF)。统计方法采用随机区组设计的方差分析(ANOVA),对8名检查者不同曝光量下测得IQF均值进行F检验,P〈0.05为差异有统计学意义。结果(1)管电压90kV,曝光量从0.5~8.0mAs变化时,随着曝光量的增大,观察者在显示器上观察到IQF逐渐减小,最小为38.54±2.82,曝光量从8.0—16.0mAs变化时,IQF逐渐增大,最大为44.334-2.35。(2)不同曝光条件下,IQF差异有统计学意义(F=60.35。P〈0.01)。结论随着X线摄影曝光量的增大,显示器图像分辨能力逐渐提高,摄影曝光量为8.0mAs,影像质量最佳,曝光量〉8.0mAs,显示器对图像细节的显示能力开始下降。Objective To explore the relationship between image quality and different exposure intensity of digital radiography ( DR). Methods Using a contrast-detail phantom Cdrad 2. 0, observers evaluated images on the monitors when exposure parameters were 90 kV and mAs ranged from 0. 5 to 16. 0 mAs. Then calculate image quality figure (IQF), and ANOVA was used to analyze the difference of IQF under different radiation dose in 8 subjects. Results ( 1 ) When exposure parameters were 90 kV and mAs altered from 0. 5 to 8. 0 mAs, the IQF observed on the monitor was reduced, and the minimal value was 38. 54 ±2. 82. When mAs changing from 8.0 to 16. 0 mAs, IQF observed on the monitor was increased,and the maximum was 44. 33 ±2. 35. (2) Under the different exposure condition, the difference of IQF values were statistically significant ( F = 60. 35, P 〈 0. 01 ). Conclusions With the increased exposure intensity, the image quality on monitor increased. When mAs was 8.0 mAs, image quality was the optimum. When mAs was more than 8. 0 mAs, the image quality on monitor reduced.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.191.160.52