检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:秦玉星[1] 盛国庆[1] 王以进[2] 姜林忠[1] 茅云伟 史荣军[1] 束军潮
机构地区:[1]丹阳市中医院骨科,江苏丹阳212300 [2]上海大学生物力学工程研究所
出 处:《中国骨伤》2008年第10期771-773,共3页China Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology
摘 要:目的:从生物力学角度探讨双头自动加压新型外固定支架的力学特性。方法:将15具新鲜湿润股骨头标本,分试验组5具和对照组10具(动力髋螺钉DHS和传统外固定支架各5具)。在试验时实行等级加载,0~1800N,加载速度1.4mn/min,分别测量股骨转子间骨折固定后的强度和刚度、扭转力学性能和股骨的极限承载能力,以比较不同器械的优劣。结果:试验组在股骨转子间固定后的强度和刚度,股骨的扭转力学性能以及极限承载能力均优于DHS和传统外固定支架(P<0.05)。结论:双头自动加压新型外固定支架嵌后比较紧密,无滑动,能有效地防止髋内翻畸形的发生。Objective:To investigate the mechanical characteristics of new type two-head automatic pressure external fix- ator in the view of biomechanics. Methods:Fifteen fresh and humid specimens were selected and divided into experimental group (5 cases) and control group (10 cases). The control group were respectively applied with DHS (5 cases) and traditional external fixator (5 cases). In order to compare the different apparatus, the strength, stiffness and twist mechanical function of femoral intertrochanteric fracture with different device were measured respectively when the specimens were under the pressure of 0-1 800 N and loading speed 1.4 mn/min. Results:The strength,stiffness,twist mechanical function and maximum endurance of femora in the experimental group were obviously superior than that of DHS and traditional external fixator (P〈0.05). Conclusion:Two head automatic new type pressure external fixator can embed more tightly without sliding,also can prevent the occurrence of coxa vara effectively.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145