检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《上海针灸杂志》2008年第10期14-15,共2页Shanghai Journal of Acupuncture and Moxibustion
摘 要:目的探寻治疗青年单纯性肥胖症的较佳疗法。方法将83例患者分为针刺加穴位埋线组28例,针刺组28例,穴位埋线组27例。观察三组疗效。结果针刺加穴位埋线组总有效率为96.4%,针刺组总有效率为82.1%,穴位埋线组总有效率为66.7%。针刺加穴位埋线组与针刺组及穴位埋线组比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),针刺组与穴位埋线组比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论针刺加穴位埋线治疗青年单纯性肥胖症疗效优于单纯针刺和穴位埋线治疗。Objective To seek a better method for treating juvenile simple obesity. Methods Eighty-three patients were allocated to an acupuncture plus aeupoint catgut embedding group of 28 cases, an acupuncture group of 28 cases and an acupoint catgut embedding group of 27 cases. The therapeutic effects were evaluated in the three groups. Results The total efficacy rate was 96.4% in the acupuncture plus aeupoint catgut embedding group. 82. 1% in the acupuncture group and 66.7% in the aeupoint catgut embedding group. There was a statistically significant difference between the acupuncture plus acupoint catgut embedding group and the acupuncture group or the acupoint catgut embedding group ( P 〈 0.05 ). There was no statistically significant difference between the acupuncture group and the acupoint catgut embedding group ( P 〉 0.05 ). Conclusion The effect of acupuncture plus acupoint catgut embedding is superior to that of acupuncture and that of acupoint catgut embedding in treating juvenile simple obesity.
分 类 号:R246.1[医药卫生—针灸推拿学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3