行政强制的理论定位:冲突与选择  

The Theoretical Positioning of Administrative Enforcement: Conflict and Choice

作　　者：吕建高[1] 谢萍[2] 

机构地区：[1]南京工业大学法学院 [2]南京工业职业技术学院

出　　处：《江苏警官学院学报》2008年第4期47-52,共6页Journal of Jiangsu Police Institute

摘　　要：行政强制权扩张的必然性和公民权益受损的可能性构成了行政强制理论前提的内在张力,行政强制权的实施以不侵害公民基本权益为底线。公正和效率是行政强制价值取向的两种表现形态,但两者之间存在着矛盾和冲突,公正是行政强制首要的价值选择。行政强制法律制度的目标是限制行政强制权力,保障公民基本权利,权利本位是行政强制的根本宗旨。司法机关执行模式和行政机关执行模式各有利弊,我国现有的行政强制执行模式存在悖谬,确立法院审查行为和行政机关执行行为严格分开的制度是行政强制法律制度的理性选择。The inevitability of the expansion of the power of administrative enforcement and the possibility of the damage of civil rights and interests are the internal intension of the theoretical prerequisite of administrative enforcement. The operation of the power of administrative enforcement is based upon the bottom line of not infringing the basic interest of the others. Equity and efficiency are two forms of the value orientation of administrative enforcement, however, they are in conflict and contradiction. Equity is the first value choice of the administrative enforcement. The purpose of the legal system of administrative enforcement is to restrict the power of administrative enforcement and to protect the basic civil rights. Right orientation is the fundamental tenet of the administrative enforcement. The execution model by judicial organ and that by administrative organ have their own advantages and disadvantages. Our present execution model of administrative enforcement is fallacious. The institutional arrangement of strictly separating the review act by the court from the execution act by the administrative organ is the rational choice of the legal system of administrative enforcement.

关 键 词：行政强制 公正 效率 权利本位 执行模式 

分 类 号：D922.1[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]