《军事计画》篡自蒋方震《军事常识》考论  

Was Cai E's Military Planning Copied from Jiang Fangzhen's Military Basics?

作　　者：吴仰湘[1] 

机构地区：[1]湖南大学岳麓书院教授,长沙410082

出　　处：《历史研究》2008年第5期168-183,共16页Historical Research

基　　金：作者2000-2002年在武汉大学历史系博士后流动站从事“蒋百里国防思想研究”的成果之一;教育部“新世纪优秀人才支持计划”(NCET-07-0270)资助

摘　　要：《军事计画》始见于1943年编印的《蔡松坡先生遗集》,最先由刘达武提出为蔡锷所著。因该书与蒋方震1917年出版的《军事常识》近乎雷同,后引起学界争议。研究表明,蔡锷生前从未透露自己撰有《军事计画》;他病逝后,其知交部下亦无人提及此事。此书系嗜好搜辑乡邦文献、特别崇敬蔡锷的刘达武篡改蒋方震《军事常识》而成。经过对勘文本异同,更能发现《军事计画》变乱《军事常识》的痕迹与破绽。当初蔡锷或对蒋方震拟订《军事常识》的写作提纲有过启迪,但后来蒋方震因故改变了书稿的性质与内容,故认为《军事常识》中包含蔡锷军事思想的观点也难以成立。Military Planning was first seen in The Posthumous Collected Works of Mr. Cai Songpo compiled and published in 1943. It was Liu Xianda who first attributed the work to Cai E. However, the work was highly controversial in academia as it was almost identical with Jiang Fangzhen's Military Basics, published in 1917. Research indicates that Cai never mentioned this work in his lifetime, nor did his close friends and subordinates do so after his death. Military Planning turns out to have been plagiarized from Jiang's Military Basics by Liu Wuda, whose hobby was collecting writings by his fellow provincials and who was a great admirer of Cai E. A comparison of the two texts clearly shows evidence of plagiary. Even though Cai contributed some suggestions to Military Basics while Jiang was drafting an outline of the work, Jiang subsequently made great changes to its nature and contents. Therefore, the view that Military Basics reflects Cai's military thinking is not really tenable.

关 键 词：军事思想 《军事计画》 《军事常识》 蔡锷 蒋方震 

分 类 号：G239.29[文化科学] E092[军事—军事理论]