“公平责任”否定论  

Negating the Fair Responsibility

作　　者：黄娅琴[1] 李小华[1] 

机构地区：[1]南昌大学立法研究中心,江西南昌330047

出　　处：《南昌大学学报（人文社会科学版）》2008年第5期46-49,共4页Journal of Nanchang University(Humanities and Social Sciences)

摘　　要：无论从历史渊源、法律规定、适用范围还是从民法的一般原理来看,我国侵权责任法中的公平责任都不是民事责任,公平责任原则也不是侵权的归责原则。所谓的公平责任其实是一种法定之债,也可以将肯定论者所谓的"公平责任"称作法定补偿。它是基于法律规定在本无权利义务的当事人之间产生的以给付一定财产为对象的债权债务关系。这种理解,理论上有依据,当事人也可接受,符合中国人的道德观念。The fair responsibility isn＇ t a civil responsibility in tort law of China no matter from its history development, legal rule or basic principle of the civil law. The fair responsibility principle isn＇ t the rule of responsibility attribution, too. The fair responsibility is really a legal debt, you can call it ＂legal compensation＂. It is the debt relation that is produced for legal rule between the parties who have no law relationship with the other parties and its object is to give some money. The understanding has the foundation on the theory and can be accepted for the parties according with the moral ideas of the Chinese.

关 键 词：公平责任 法定之债 否定论 

分 类 号：D923.8[政治法律—民商法学]