“纯粹法学”视角下的立法权正当行使及其批判  

The Right Exertion of Legislative Power from Angle of Pure Theory of Law and Criticism

作　　者：汤善鹏[1] 

机构地区：[1]南京师范大学法学院,江苏南京210046

出　　处：《河北法学》2008年第12期51-54,共4页Hebei Law Science

基　　金：江苏省教育厅高校哲学社会科学基金指导项目(07SJD820011);南京师范大学青年人才科研培育项目(0709021)

摘　　要：立法权正当行使的判准不能由立法权权力本身来证明,它的判断标准不在于法律的"实证性",更重要的是需要突破"法条"回归立法的"社会"维度。在这种意义上,我们探讨凯尔森的"纯粹法学"对立法权正当行使的影响,并揭示其理论的限度就显得十分必要。哈耶克和莱奥尼对凯尔森的理论进行了深刻的批判。哈耶克从社会理论出发认为立法权正当行使不能超越内部规则,而在莱奥尼看来,立法权正当行使应当来源于个人的诉求。The criterion of right exertion of legislative power can not be testified by the power itself. The criterion is not rested with legal positivism but social dimensionality. In this sense, the discussion that the influence of Kelsen＇s pure theory of law to fight exertion of legishtive power and limitation of Kdsen＇s theory is very important. Hayek and Leoni had animadverted on the Kelsen＇s theory sharply. From Hayek＇s theory of society, the right exertion of legislative power should not surpass the inner rule. From Leoni, the right exertion of legislative power should root in personal request.

关 键 词：立法权 纯粹法学 社会秩序 

分 类 号：D916[政治法律—法学] D90