检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]山东大学临床医学院整形美容外科,山东济南250013
出 处:《中国美容医学》2008年第10期1467-1468,共2页Chinese Journal of Aesthetic Medicine
摘 要:目的:评估并比较同一患者应用两种方法治疗下睑睑袋的美容效果。方法:选择36个病例,一侧下睑行传统的睑成形术,即切除下睑眶隔内脂肪,另一侧不去除眶脂而是行睑囊筋膜疝修补术。结果:术后2~6个月进行评估,两者外形无明显差异,其美容效果相当。结论:两术式远期外形无明显差异,美容效果相当,但后者术中不适感及疼痛较轻,术后并发症更少,具有门诊推行价值。Objective Evaluate and compare the effect of us bags. Methods Select 36 cases. For each case, one side ng two different methods for a patient to treat the palpebral eye was performed the orthodox blepharoplasty, that is, to remove the orbital fat in lower eyelid; and the other eye was performed the hernioplasty of eyelid fascial cyst. Results 2N6 months after the operations, it is found that the outlines of the two results are almost the same, and the aesthetic effects are equivalent. Conclusions Two treatment results have not obvious differences in the long-term, and the aesthetic effects are the same. But the second one has the advantages of less discomfort and pain in operation and less complications after operation. It is worth to be recommended in clinical treatment.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.139.94.189